>>>>Yes, IE.
>>>
>>>It's not 1997 anymore. I'd consider switching.
>>
>>yeah, well, thanks
>
>
>My personal experience was, "I use Microsoft products, and IE is always there. That's what I'll use."
>
>One day I didn't have much of a choice. I found that the new Mozilla had better usability, performance, and stability.
>
>I wondered why I didn't switch sooner.
>
>The same thing happened in reverse years before that.
>
>1994, Netscape 2.0.
>
>It was pretty cool. In the following years, MS IE 2.0 blew it out of the water. It had better usability, performance, and stability, and while IE was ascending, Netscape seemed to go downhill.
>
>We've come full circle again.
>
>Don't use IE.
Thing is I'm down to my last 4.8 Gb now, and i wish to greatly expand my music playlist (recently got a Nano), so I could do without another large prog. However, i have heard good stuff of Mozilla. Maybe I'll get round to tring it one of these days. Cheers Mike.
- Whoever said that women are the weaker sex never tried to wrest the bedclothes off one in the middle of the night
- Worry is the interest you pay, in advance, for a loan that you may never need to take out.