>>>The idea that Huckabee could be too liberal for anyone is astonishing. Based on what I've heard, he's by far the most conservative candidate.
>
>
>>http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi_menuItemID=887566059a3aedb6efaaa9e27a808a0c&ndmViewId=news_view&ndmConfigId=1000014&newsId=20080116006191&newsLang=en
>>http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/742931899.html
>>http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2008/01/huckabees_liberal_record.php
>>http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/2007/12/23/mitt-romney-mike-huckabee-liberal-on-taxes-spending/
>>http://www.savethegop.com/2008/01/02/rush-huckabee-liberal-thompson-conservative/
>>http://www.fred08.com/NewsRoom/PressRelease.aspx?ID=93f6c3dc-1750-438d-b9ae-9a57231a8dcd
>>http://holycoast.blogspot.com/2008/01/huckabees-liberal-tendencies.html
>>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/huckabee-liberal
>>
>>I intentionally targeted some GOP sites to point out that it is mostly coming from the Republicans.
>>
>
>Looks like we're dealing with the ambiguity of English again. Without digging too deep, looks like it's a question of fiscal vs. social conservatism. Huckabee is certainly way conservative on social issues.
>

Not believing in evolution, yes, that would be considered socially conservative....

He does have one favorite campaign saying I like: "I want to see us need the Saudis' oil about as much as we need their sand."