>>>>It's a fact that you use the word whining, but does that prove that I was whining? I don't think so. The problem with reactions like yours is that when I express disagreement, you would see that as a continuation of whining and worrying. I can't really help it that you think that way. It's not in my hands. And I don't worry about it.
>>>
>>>I know that you were not whining but just trying to express your point. But usually the more you try (or me) the worse it gets. There should be some sympathy, otherwise the people will see it differently, they way they want to suit their point of view.
>>
>>
>>Naomi,
>>
>>Please !
>>It's time to stop this !
>>
>>The more you bring all this s...t, the more things will go against you.
>>The more you cry about being twitted, more people will twit you.
>
>Cesar, this reaction to Naomi is nonsense. Her reaction was directed to me and she's essentially pleaing me to stop, rather than to 'bring all this shit' even more. Also she's not crying at all.

Peter,

Someone along the way said yoou were living a Monty Python skit. I must agree.

She was pleading for you to stop?... Plese show me the words in her message that say that. There were no such words. In fact her statement was hardly sensible... see her words about 'sympathy'.

And you say she's not crying at all. Maybe you should read the first messge of this thread.

Surey EVEN YOU can see that the overwhelming majority have no sympathy for Naomi's desire to be loved by everyone. Only someone like Naomi could turn such great sympathy into even greater distaste in the space of a few short months.