>>>>I think he should just let it be.
>>>
>>>I agree.
>>
>>May I offer a clearer translation of this:
>>
>>>It's a fvcking shlt pissar of a g0d danm rule if you fvcking ask me!
>>
>>It's a knowing stool urinator of a deity condemned rule if you knowing ask me!
>>
>>See? No need to that kind of language when you can say it all with regular language.
>
>Well, fiddle-dee-dang! I should have thought of that before I got yelled at in a personal email. Now, I can't say who sent me what, because I think that's against some other rules, but I have to clean up my fvcking language. Though it seems others are ok. Is this the old witch hunt of old? Not sure, but it sure smells like stool. Not a problem though; the sender goes directly to my Spam box now...
The Spam box? Ah, the Twit filter of your email client! Well, I guess not many here will criticize you for that. Most seem to agree that everybody here is free to use the twit filter for anybody for whatever reason. The same logic will be applied by them for people using the spam filter for their email.
I'm not one of them though. I think it's an idiotic act to add this person to your spam box. He is not spamming you and it can hamper future communication.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
