Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Why the economic downturn is diff this time
Message
From
14/02/2008 10:54:22
 
 
To
13/02/2008 16:57:20
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01292172
Message ID:
01292589
Views:
20
No unfortunately, you're not understanding some basics of the US economy, which allows you to read the "stuff" (ut won't allow me to use the word I really want to use) on heritage foundation.

84,000 and above is the income of 20% of the households (a family living under 1 roof). I do believe there is a fundamental change occurring with the US economy. I was reading about this a while back. How people were earning upwards of $20/hr from factories in rust belt cities. Now their jobs are shipped overseas, the jobs left for them pay maybe $12-14/hr.

Much like the long tours forced on our US military straining families, so does this reduction in pay.

>What I found amazing is this phrase:
>
>the top fifth of U.S. households (with incomes above $84,000)
>
>The top fifth of U.S. households is anyone with an income over 84,000/yr? Since when? I guess that means 168,000/yr for two income households?
>
>
>
>>I especially found this para interesting...
>>
>>"Inclusion of taxes and non-cash aid substantially reduces economic inequality. In stage 1, the bottom quintile was shown to have 3.5 percent of total income; by stage 2C, this number had risen to 5.35 percent. The income share of the top quintile falls from 49.6 percent in stage 1 to 46.16 percent in stage 2C."
>>
>>Only the Heritage Foundation could define 1.35% as "substantial".
>>
>>
>>
>>>>I think you may find this interesting:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1791.cfm
>>>
>>>I *guess* they hinge their whole argument on the fact that the Census Bureau quintiles have unequal "populations" in them.
>>>
>>>Somehow I trust the Census Bureau's techniques by far over the Heritage organization. The Census Bureau has been using various methods for well over a hundred years... long before there were MBAs and other 'statisticians' paid for specific results.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Interesting opinion on why current events don't equate past downturns:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/13/opinion/13reich.html?ex=1360645200&en=033f6da01d771f7d&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

(On an infant's shirt): Already smarter than Bush
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform