Information générale
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Versions des environnements
>>As a preference... in your field names... do you include the type as part of the description...? even if you are using Hungarian notation...? such as...
>>
>>tstarttime vs tstart
>>dduedate vs ddue
>
>NO.
>But why does yor example suggest that dDueDate could be DDate... why not DueDate. Similarly for StartTime.
>Do you notice that getting away from abbreviating absolutely everything also lets the fields define their type almost by default?
That is why I questioned it. If I elect to use Hungarian (which I have) then naming a field dduedate seems redundant. It's saying dduedate=dateduedate whereas my example ddue=duedate. It seems pointless to include the word "date" at the end of something that the notation says is a date.
BTW - I don't think my example suggested that dDueDate could be DDate.
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement