>>
>>(I don't recall having interacted with him, ever.) Your opinion about him was clear enough, the minute you delighted responded to Michel. And sure, you are fully entitled to tell everybody here that you don't like him. BUT, why insult? It does not strengthen your case at all. Instead, people might start wondering what your role has been in the conflicts the two of you had.
>
>You ask 'Why insult'. If you had any idea which words JVP used at me, both here on UT, and in person, you would understand why I called him a piece of ..! My description of him is NOTHING compared to what I had to swallow.
>
>ANd to make it 100% clear, I had no intention of insulting Kevin, I just get bored with his 'I am right and you are wrong' attitude. He acts childishly, which is why I asked him to grow up and get a life. OK?

To first filter him and write here that he acts childishly and should grow up and get a life is an indication to me that he irritates you, or rather that you are irritated by him. I don't think that Kevin was trying to irritate you on purpose. He was arguing and for some reason you didn't want to invest in that debate. I think there are other, better ways of suppressing the involvement in a debate. My request to you is to undo the twit filter action. The filter system here only disturbs communication because you do no longer see all replies. It's like being on a party and you see some people talking, but you don't hear them. It's like interacting with people in burka's. You know there's someone inside, but no facial expressions can be interpreted.