>Good: you have the idea, but you did not try it yourself, you did not find any appropriate example either. So, what is the point of talking about it, what is the point of saying that something is not appropriate in the code that I posted? I do not think it is the way the discussion should continue.

Hi Yuri,

I am not sure why you're always twisting what I am saying. I said, that we can implement binding to Windows Events instead of using a timer. The code sample is in the Solutions New in VFP9\Binding to Windows Message events. Yes, I didn't try it myself, but I was thinking about it and wanted to suggest an alternative which to me seems to be better resource wise.

I don't have VFP at the computers I'm writting messages, so I can dig some code from various places, but I thought the idea is transparent enough.

I am not saying that the current implementation is bad, but I believe it could be improved with this idea.

BTW, where did I say the highlighted phrase? I think this is your interpretation, which is incorrect.