This is my take on it.

JR: JVP was wrong because he said VFP is insecure.
KG: No, he was correct VFP is insecure.
JR: No, the DBF is insecure. Not VFP
KG: I agree, that what I meant VFP is insecure. VFP, the database.
JR: .NET can be insecure if used in certain ways
KG: No, You can encrypt XML
JR: You can still make insecure apps in .NET
KG: I don't get it, what are we talking about? JVP is correct.

Either you missed what I took as JR's point or you are engaging in the type of intellectual dishonesty you frown upon.



>OK, fine. ;)
>
>I "still" don't get why you were so up in arms about what JVP said back in 2004. But given that generally you've made arguments in favor of JVP's return, I also don't feel like debating this, unless you specifically can state why you had such issues with what he said. Otherwise, we're just dancing (and sorry, I'd rather dance with a chick)