>First of all, John was banned for much more than that and you know it. And I was never one asking for him to get banned. So don't start this crap.
>
>Walter, I never said that you asked for him to be banned. But the fact remains that John was banned because of five "sensitive" messages, and some were to you.

Again, you know that there was more to it. He broke other rules such as creating fake accounts.
And how do you know it were 5 sensitive messages? In my impression it were far more than that, and as far as I can remember none of them were addressed to me.