but truthfully, I don't need any references to the allegations.

I'm simply responding to your earlier request for references.

We have Walter on record today (which you did not challenge), and you've referred to another one. That's sufficient.

OK. I'd still like to see the threads where a certain poster was swarmed by Fox-heads who did not like his politely expressed technical points. To be honest, I think it's a fable. As I recall, technical contribution was at best 5% of the total "contribution" towards the end. The rest was baiting and bickering. But perhaps I was wrong, so I'll simply continue to invite the claimants to provide their evidence, just as they regularly ask of others.