>>>>Since advertising pays for the shows' (and in some cases the channel's) existence, it would all go away... A few stations have gone off the air shortly after they first broadcast.
>>>
>>>Which sucks - there is no other viable model to publish anything or have a service (on either web, or TV or paper) and make money on it, but via advertising.
>>
>>Have you ever *heard* of HBO ? <g>
>>
>>As the means of distribution is more efficient viewers will be able to be more selective and buy what they want. No ads, just pay for content. The trick is to be able to make the content available to a wide enough market that highly specialized tastes can be served.
>
>Sounds more like the internet than any kind of broadcast TV, including HBO. HBO has a much smaller audience than the "big 4" networks but it still numbers in the tens of millions. No question the whole television model is in a period of transition.
>
>As an aside, I am letting my HBO subscription go as soon as "The Wire" ends in a few weeks. All the series I liked will be gone.
You're just bitter because they cancelled 'John from Cincinatti' <g>
I imagine there will always be some kind of advertizing funded 'broadcast' TV. But the share will continue to dwindle.
Charles Hankey
Though a good deal is too strange to be believed, nothing is too strange to have happened.
- Thomas Hardy
Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don't mean to do harm-- but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.
-- T. S. Eliot
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
- Ben Franklin
Pardon him, Theodotus. He is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe and island are the laws of nature.
