>>I totally missd that this was directed to Walter.
>>
>>Obviously, if he answers the challenge, then it isn't crap.
>>
>>I don't understand why Walter's validation would "un-crap" it.
>
>*IF* it was a "general" challenge - just show me how you solve the problem using whatever you want - then it would be crap.
>
>But you addressed it specifically to WalterM so it is his decision alone as to whether it is crap.
>
>Get it?

I guess I'm a little dense today because I don't. Kevin devised a problem to write sql code to solve a certain set of criteria. What is it about the problem that makes it crap?

>
>
>
>>
>>However, I respect and appreciate the fact that Walter responded with something.