My point precisely.

You're also right that I was expressing frustration.

>Well, and it dawned on me that he surely didn't mean any such thing. More likely just one of those exclamations of frustration we Americans voice when something thrawts our goals :o) Of course we want anyone who wants to run for president and meets the qualification requirements to be able to, but Nader jumping into the mix surely won't make the Dems job any easier.
>
>>Picky Picky Picky ;)
>>There is a vast difference between, what we have, a 'representative democracy' and a 'democracy'. To have a real democracy we will need a "totally secure VFP internet application" and a high speed connection and secure password access for every person of voting age. That will allow all the people of each of our countries to vote yes, no or abstain on every issue.
>>
>>>You know, this smacks an awful lot like fighting democracy. It's as though democracy is fine as long as it doesn't interfere with your candidate's chances.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yes. That doesn't make it any more palatable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Like Ross Perot and the Republican party in 1992? :o)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/24/nader.politics/index.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>If Ralph Nader tips another election to the Republicans I am personally going to assassinate him. What an egomaniac.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Assasinating him would just put the worthless dirtbag out of his own misery.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It wouldn't bother me much if Ralph felt miserable. What I don't like is that he is a carrier, bringing misery to the Democratic party.