>>>>>
>>>>>There seems (still) to be big encouragement - at least by the media - for Bloomberg to run. Why is Nader such a joke?... and such a 'destroyer'?
>>>>
>>>>Well, if you mean why Bloomberg and not Nadar - Nadar is a legend in his own mind. Bloomberg actually has a sucessful track record running various things and at least can be taken seriously as a possible President ( and would probably get my vote over McCain and certainly over Obama - fine men though they both are. )
>>>
>>>Fine. But why does the media feel it has to tell you (the U.S. voters) so? I'm sure the people have it figured out. Why can't the media just report the news or show some respect for all candidates?
>>
>>A better complaint would be that American cable news either leans left or right and also spends entirely too much time on the coming election. If it isn't a biased story on the election they speak of then the time spent trying to sensationalize a murder. What a waste! There are all kinds of stories worth covering. They all need their arses kicked. Gee it's great being old at last so I can complain about governments and the gall danged never ending media slant! GGGRrrrrrrr
>
>Don't forget to tell the kids to pull up their pants and cut their hair.
Pull up your pants and get a hair cut. And stay off my lawn!
I ain't skeert of nuttin eh?
Yikes! What was that?