>>Did it with BMP , opened with MS PAINT and it seem to confirm exactly my naked eye findings.
>>
>>Pixel distribution line height looks like this
>>0=1 pix
>>1=1 pix
>>2=2 pix
>>3=3 pix
>>4=4 pix
>>
>>Beyond this point is all in your good hands :)
>>(Unless this is the way it suppose to be)
>>
>>I would expect results as folows;
>>PEN/PIX
>>-------
>>0 = 1
>>1 = 2
>>2 = 3
>>3 = 4
>>.
>>So there is gradual increase of line size.
>>
>>
>>
>>Also, See PM pls
>
>Thanks for testing.
>
>I've just checked the original codes from the .NET classes, and the API calls that we are doing in GdiPlusX is passing EXACTLY the same parameters.
>
>So it seems that this is by design from the API gdiplus.dll, and for this case it does not justify to make it behave differently from the .NET classes.
>Anyway, I hope to reproduce this test by myself later, and will let you know.
>
>For the moment, that's an interesting catch !

It seem to be general Gdi+ thing. I checked in report designer
it does exactly the same. Size 0 and 1 show the same results.
Therefore as you said there is nothing to fix. It is by design.

>
>About the PM, I've just arrived from a travel, and things are still really confused by my side...

No problem / I tought so :)

Thks+++
Sergio