>Wasn't that in a later message though? Not his first response?
>

Yes, you're right. His original response was posted on Feb. 27 at 9:41 AM. The message I cited was posted the same day at 12:13.

However, looking at the thread map, it appears that most of the discussion was spawned by that second message, not the first.

Tamar
>
>>>If this were any other thread, I would concede your point. However, the original message was:
>>>
>>>I'm curoius - is anyone doing any serious, long-term new development with VFP?
>>>The last 4 companies I worked for are all moving to C#.net.
>>>
>>>I think Woodie's post was relative and he gave his honest opinion. It is definitely an opinion many will not like, but it is his opinion and appropriate given the original message.
>>
>>I thought the inflammatory part was the line about how no one with more than beginner's experience could have an opinion other than his.
>>
>>Tamar