>I support this initiative. But I think that it requires a moderator anyway. Unless it is really the big plan to shut down the chatter section the very minute some individual makes a remark that is regarded as offensive or insulting by whoever says so.
>
>Repair: A 'Request Review by Moderator' button and a variety of actions the moderator can choose from. Think of a yellow card or a red card for the thread, for the section or for the whole forum.
>
>Another idea is to make the thread starter one of two moderators and give this person the ability to act as such.


Peter,

IMO, the good moderator is the one that does not need to make interventions all the time.
As Michel said, he is not obliged to read and judge all messages from member.
You know, and you even admitted in a past thread that you like to bring some discussions and sometime you may be provocative, but your intentions are good.

This is not anymore a matter of intentions. I believe that all UT users have good intentions. But all UT members are smart enough to understand that UT has a huge number of users, from different cultures, cities, religions, ethics, political choices, etc.

What joins us is VFP, basically.
At least we should try to respect others opinions, and stop being agressive all the time.

Have you noticed that whoever you or anyone send an agressive message, a real battle will start.
Everybody here is tired.


Lets go back to the origin of UT that is to discuss, develop and share knowledge about VFP. Let's join forces to bring back UTMAG. Let's join to build things.
In the last times, all I've seen was destruction. Destruction of good relationships, friendships.

Time to change !