Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Israel / Palestine Map
Message
From
02/03/2008 09:03:17
 
 
To
01/03/2008 15:05:51
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01297944
Message ID:
01298036
Views:
26
I think that's right, but I'm pretty sure it was intended to be part of the revised 1947 partition plan.

>I think Israel captured the Golan Heights in 1967, didn't they?
>
>>>>Came across this pic from a Reddit link. What do you make of this, is it correct or propaganda/misinformation?
>>>>
>>>>http://www.funhostr.com/p/nab7FZkc/This_explains_a_lot
>>>
>>>Certainly doesn't look like it's fully accurate. Among other things, it appears to show the Golan Heights as having been Israeli all along. If that's wrong, I wonder what else is.
>>
>>Are we looking at the same thing? The map seems to show the Golan Heights as Israeli only from the 1947 partition on.
>>
>>>
>>>They've also left out a map showing the land Israel captured in 1967 that they've now returned as part of treaties such as the Sinai peninsula. (I had a Hebrew School teacher at the time who was quite good at doing a free-hand drawing of Israel on the blackboard. I remember vividly when suddenly the map he draw was quite different.)
>>>
>>>I'd also like to understand where the first map comes from. There were a lot of Palestinian Jews before the partition, and they'd been acquiring land for a long time, draining swamps and making the land usable for agricultural. The amount shown on the first map seems awfully small.
>>>
>>
>>I agree with you, although, I don't know for certain how accurate or inaccurate that map is. I am sure though that the map of the 1947 partition proposal is a far cry from the way the map would have been before it. Of course, it's just a map, and even though the Israelis were given more land than the Arabs, a large chunk of that land was the Negev desert (not exactly arable).
>>
>>>Of course, by showing only maps, the page fails to explain that it was the Arabs who rejected the partition plan shown in the second map.
>>
>>Speaking even as a Jew, I have to admit that had I been Arab at that time, I think it's likely I'd have rejected the proposal too. Especially when you consider that, at the time, 2/3 of the population of the territory was Arab and only 1/3 was Jewish and that 2/3 of the population really had no voice in the proposal.
>>
>>>
>>>Finally, since there's no scale given, and all the Arab countries around Israel/Palestine are omitted, there's no way to understand that the total amount of land shown there is tiny.
>>>
>>>Thought they don't include the history, both of these seem to give better current context:
>>>
>>>http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.mapsofworld.com/israel/maps/israel-map.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.mapsofworld.com/israel/israel-political-map.html&h=135&w=89&sz=58&tbnid=Z1MS1rNe83wJ:&tbnh=135&tbnw=89&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=1&ct=image&cd=2
>>>
>>>http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://geology.com/world/israel-map.gif&imgrefurl=http://geology.com/world/israel-satellite-image.shtml&h=141&w=109&sz=56&tbnid=JQ3cZtU6tIkJ:&tbnh=141&tbnw=109&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=1&ct=image&cd=1
>>>
>>>Tamar
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform