Hi Michel,

it will not change inside or outside code block. The problem is, that I can not mention a html tag. I can once, using &_g_t_;, but if I update or reply, it will tranform into its respective sign and will be lost. For example a <BlaBal > will be shown correctly in the orignal mail, but will be lost in replys or updates. After a simple Preview / Update it will be transformed an no more invisible.

Look in the line below and see whats happen.
<blu >
The one you see is generated with &_g_t_;, and this is not a tag. But this will be lost after a reply. And this is not what I would expect. It should keep the &_g_t_;, but should display the sign.

For the code thing. I agree that tags within the pre block should not be do any html action. But they should remain as entered.


Agnes

>>

>>#IF .F.
>>I've noticed that if I put a &_g_t_; and edit the message afterwards (Update / reply) the &_g_t_; turns to > (as this one).
>>This will not be shown later on. (Thats why I wrote this as a comment)
>>#endif
>>='>'
>>

>
>Inside code, no tag should be put in there. This will be converted automatically.