Which do you find more readable and why?
REPLACE IN crsrAutoRateBillItems;
arbi_bcm_fk WITH crsrResult.pdb_bcm_fk, ;
arbi_bcm_code WITH crsrResult.bcm_code, ;
arbi_bfn_fk WITH crsrResult.bcm_bfn_fk, ;
arbi_bcm_rate WITH crsrResult.pdb_rate, ;
arbi_bcm_notbillable WITH crsrResult.pdb_notbillable, ;
arbi_bcm_use_billcode WITH crsrResult.pdb_use_commcode, ;
arbi_bcm_min WITH crsrResult.pdb_min, ;
arbi_bcm_allowed WITH crsrResult.pdb_allowed, ;
arbi_bcm_order WITH ((crsrResult.pdb_order*10)+1), ;
arbi_desc WITH ALLTRIM(crsrResult.pdb_desc), ;
arbi_pieces WITH 0, ;
arbi_weight WITH 0, ;
arbi_qty WITH crsrResult.bcm_qty, ;
arbi_rate WITH 0, ;
arbi_ratetype WITH crsrResult.bcm_billtype, ;
arbi_amount WITH 0, ;
arbi_revcode WITH crsrResult.bcm_revcode, ;
arbi_dept WITH crsrResult.bcm_dept, ;
arbi_prompt WITH !crsrProdBillNoCNS.pdb_notbillable, ;
arbi_exception WITH .F., ;
arbi_source WITH 3
or
REPLACE IN crsrAutoRateBillItems;
arbi_bcm_fk WITH crsrResult.pdb_bcm_fk, ;
arbi_bcm_code WITH crsrResult.bcm_code, ;
arbi_bfn_fk WITH crsrResult.bcm_bfn_fk, ;
arbi_bcm_rate WITH crsrResult.pdb_rate, ;
arbi_bcm_notbillable WITH crsrResult.pdb_notbillable, ;
arbi_bcm_use_billcode WITH crsrResult.pdb_use_commcode, ;
arbi_bcm_min WITH crsrResult.pdb_min, ;
arbi_bcm_allowed WITH crsrResult.pdb_allowed, ;
arbi_bcm_order WITH ((crsrResult.pdb_order*10)+1), ;
arbi_desc WITH ALLTRIM(crsrResult.pdb_desc), ;
arbi_pieces WITH 0, ;
arbi_weight WITH 0, ;
arbi_qty WITH crsrResult.bcm_qty, ;
arbi_rate WITH 0, ;
arbi_ratetype WITH crsrResult.bcm_billtype, ;
arbi_amount WITH 0, ;
arbi_revcode WITH crsrResult.bcm_revcode, ;
arbi_dept WITH crsrResult.bcm_dept, ;
arbi_prompt WITH !crsrProdBillNoCNS.pdb_notbillable, ;
arbi_exception WITH .F., ;
arbi_source WITH 3
Everything makes sense in someone's mind
public class SystemCrasher :ICrashable
In addition, an integer field is not for irrational people
