>Jim,
>
>Thanks for your suggestion.
>
>As the function is currently defined, it expects a reference to an array for its parameter. So, I opted for the solution to copy the array locally, and then call the function with a reference to the local array.
>
>Seems to me that C++ is a lot cleaner in situations like this.
>
>(Will that begin, or restart, the debate about which language is more object oriented??)
>
>Jim

C++ is definitely more OOP, there are no questions about it.