However, when we have another situation of a "behind the back informant", you seem far less interested in holding the "anonymous e-mailer" accountable.

There's a big difference between MVPs using their relationships and power to damage a community member, and an anonymous coward getting a buzz from covering their tracks and getting away with it. IMHO.

Could it be that you were only ever interested in public criticism to begin with because you had some disagreements with Marcia....and that you might feel a bit of sympathy for someone who felt "provoked" by Woody's initial post?

I struggle to get the full meaning from the juxtaposition ;-) but in her defense, I've never met, had any dealings with or had reason to complain about Marcia prior to recent events. I presume you have an ulterior motive trying to suggest that I might have one. ;-)