And you likely never will. MF doesn't share stuff like that.

>I have to say that looking through the threads leading up to Kevin going I can't see why its happened.
>
>>Peter, For the first time, I have to agree with you.
>>If our moderator had been more present, and at least a warning message was sent in those problematic threads, I think that this problem would have certainly been avoided.
>>
>>Michel posted a general "warning", but I suspect that some people did not understand what exacltly was included in the warning... Too bad... for all of us.
>>
>>Kevin Goff will be indeed a big loss for UT.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Just wanted to nofity that Kevin has been banned from the UT.
>>>>
>>>>I'm not going to take any sides in this matter, but to me it was a bit unexpected since Kevin and I got into really technical arguments without bitching eachother. That initself was a real accomplishment.
>>>>
>>>>I avoided Kevins other threads, so I don't know what the reasoning is for banning him and I really do not want to make any speculations as of why he was been banned.
>>>>
>>>>I'm considering continue the dicussions with kevin on another platform (maybe his blogg). Just to let you know.
>>>
>>>I think he was joking here (Message #1300352), but maybe Kevin wasn't in the eyes of the 'administration'.
>>>
>>>What strikes me is that there's no public statement of the administration. Confidentiality is a positive thing, sure, but so is an honest and open statement. And it must be possible to write such a statement without disclosing really confidential facts.
>>>
>>>Oh, by the way, this will be my only message in this thread. I will not further participate in this 'debate', although it is kind of special. But I want the people to know what I think of it. See my topmost remark in the signature and (re)read Message #1299161 for a broader explanation.