Matt,

>To me, Oakleaf seems like kinda like a "one-man" show, whereas someone like DevExpress which seems more like a "company" in that they seem to have a large staff and an awesome website. (Kevin, please do not be offended, I am just sharing the thoughts and concerns so that you can see what runs through the minds of potential customers).
>
>However, I know that Kevin is a long-time player with his framework, and has a good VFP background, and that do plays in to it for me. Sometimes being small is not all that bad. I just wish we knew about market share of all the options so we could see who uses what. That really means a lot to me, even though I know it probably shouldn't. Of course, they all want to keep that private.
>
>I would love see see MM.NET get its own web site user forum, and he has mentioned that he is considering this. Over all though, still dicussions on UT about MM.NET seem to be very low in volume. I guess that must mean MM is really easy to use!

We actually do have other developers besides myself working for Oak Leaf on MM .NET. Now that we are code-complete on MM .NET 3.5 (e-mails going out soon). We are looking at additional hosting options or tech support...you're right in that the MM .NET documentation is extremely thorough and that helps keep the volume of tech support down. We also have quite a few developers who have opted to purchase direct support, so much of those questions don't make it to the public forum.

Best Regards,