No, (here I go nit-picking :o) because the statement was
I see nothing wrong. The writer is not commenting on things he/she doesn't see or know about and is not speculating at all. The writer is only commenting on what he/she has observed.
>>Actually 'This banning is unjustified' is speculation, but "I see nothing wrong that Kevin has done in the recent past that would warrant a ban" is not speculation but an observation based on personal knowledge by reading his messages.
>>
>>>Then let us also turn this topic around and tell everyone that are making claims like "This banning is unjustified!" and "I see nothing wrong that Kevin has done in the recent past that would warrant a ban". These are also speculations, as you point out we do not know what motivated Michel to ban Kevin.
>
>Not to "nitpick" but if Kevin did something behind the scenes, that is no visible to members, but rather between Kevin and the administration, then it would be speculation.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"