>>Mike/Tamar
>>
>>I apologize if it appeared that way, I meant the response to both, not just you. In fact, I copied Tamar on it as well. I should have addressed my message to you both I guess.
>>
>>Perhaps I interpretated your messages incorrectly, but I just found it amazing that Tamar, who is so careful not to disparage anyone publicly (as far as I can see here on the UT), would be so quick to suspect Kevin of giving JVP access to the UT and announce that speculation publicly without evidence.
>
>I was careful to label it speculation, and to state that I had "a single data point" to base it on. I've mentioned elsewhere in the thread what the data point is.
>
>Based on past history, I don't see Michel banning Kevin just for annoying people (which he'd been doing increasingly over the past few months). Thus, I surmised something else was going on behind the scenes, and given the data I had, made a guess, which I clearly labeled as such.
>
>Tamar

So Kevin must be lying.