>>I looked over the rules and if I wanted to find some interpretation to ban Kevin if I so wished I surely could. The rules acknowledge that some rules are based on interpretation (one man's troll is another's hero - an example *not* connected to Kevin in my eyes - although I disliked the Cato approach). What is puzzling is that (while reserving the right to ban in "necessary" cases without personal warning before, but citing unavailability as example) the usual procedure is to clearly warn before any action is taken. This does not fit with the things posted by Bonnie and John as received personal communication by Kevin.
>
>It depends on the severity of the situation. Each situation is different. So, just to provide you some definition on how notices are sent or not, here is the explanation.

Where is the explanation?