I don't recall reading anything as offensive as Mike H's post about his mother and he didn't get banned (to my knowledge).
>>>Actually 'This banning is unjustified' is speculation, but "I see nothing wrong that Kevin has done in the recent past that would warrant a ban" is not speculation but an observation based on personal knowledge by reading his messages.
>>
>>My ***GUESS*** is that *something* transpired very near to the actual banishment that precipitated it. But I don't think that KevinG's more recent "contributions" to the VFP forum helped his case either.
>
>I haven't been around lately - can you link a post that was so offensive? I asked somebody else yesterday and they didn't have the bite to go with the bark.
>
>>>
>>>>Then let us also turn this topic around and tell everyone that are making claims like "This banning is unjustified!" and "I see nothing wrong that Kevin has done in the recent past that would warrant a ban". These are also speculations, as you point out we do not know what motivated Michel to ban Kevin.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"