>>>Actually 'This banning is unjustified' is speculation, but "I see nothing wrong that Kevin has done in the recent past that would warrant a ban" is not speculation but an observation based on personal knowledge by reading his messages.
>>
>>My ***GUESS*** is that *something* transpired very near to the actual banishment that precipitated it. But I don't think that KevinG's more recent "contributions" to the VFP forum helped his case either.
>
>I haven't been around lately - can you link a post that was so offensive? I asked somebody else yesterday and they didn't have the bite to go with the bark.

I suppose you mssed the great big "***GUESS***" that was the second word of my sentence.
When I say "very near to the actual banishment" I mean in time... something was written/said/done that brought it on. I suspect that I was fast asleep at that time. I suspect, if it was a thread message, that it has been removed.

But, and I repeat, this is strictly a *****G U E S S*****



>
>>>
>>>>Then let us also turn this topic around and tell everyone that are making claims like "This banning is unjustified!" and "I see nothing wrong that Kevin has done in the recent past that would warrant a ban". These are also speculations, as you point out we do not know what motivated Michel to ban Kevin.