I agree completely.


>Kevin and I don't always agree, but not in a million years would I question his integrity. He says what he thinks. If he says he did not do any of this, then afaic he didn't. Case closed.
>
>If he had done this, he'd acknowledge it. That's just how he is.
>
>>When you lay it out like that, it's entirely plausible. It would have to be someone with the knowledge and ability to do it and some one with an axe to grind. Or maybe just a despicable person!
>>
>>
>>>Without wanting to seem paranoid: I'm wondering whether the person who targeted Woodie has gone after KG as well, except smarter. What if they used a proxy in KG's ISP subnet to create "joe-bob" accounts in UT, send inflammatory e-mails to Michel or otherwise cause mischief. If KG has used his ISP's proxy or if the cunning @#$%^# could get KG to respond to an e-mail, it is eminently possible for them to harness the same IP address to cause mischief for which KG would be blamed.
>>>
>>>Paranoid? Perhaps... but then how do you explain KG's absolute denial that he's responsible for the behaviors warned of in Michel's earlier post. I can't eliminate the suggestion that some spiteful person is re-enacting parts of recent unfortunate events in the hopes of hurting others. FWIW, I had the same thought when KG described receiving an e-mail inviting him to criticize another UT member... remember that? Anyway, if there is any possibilty that KG has been targeted I'm sure the UT administrators will act accordingly. Of course this is entirely conjecture and I may have the wrong end of the stick completely, but it's worth raising IMHO.