>>>>Hi Mike.
>>>>
>>>>>I am surprised as well. Kevin has been irritating the heck out of me lately but I don't know what he did that was over the line. In general I am not in favor of people being banned, not when a twit filter exists for those so inclined.
>>>>
>>>>I agree. Kevin has been pretty annoying for a while now, but one can always choose not to read or respond. I was really surprised at his ban and can't think of a good reason for it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I'm only speculating here based on a single data point, but I have a reason to suspect that Kevin may have been giving JVP access to the UT. If that's the case, then I imagine that's why he would have been banned.
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>>According to Kevin, he did no such thing. I accept him at this word, not just because I like the guy (as much as I disagree with him sometimes), but because he generally says what he means. He as enough integrity imho that he'd own up if the did that, or at least he would not unequivocally deny it in capital letters.
>
>Given his denial and no additional data, I'll accept that. Nonetheless, I do suspect that whatever got him banned wasn't as simple as what he wrote in his messages.
>
>Tamar
I agree. I see nothing in his messages that should result in banishment. I don't know how likely the speculation is, but if true, then I suppose it's certainly possible that someone might have made it appear as if he were loaning out his account.
If that is the case, then Michel's 'no appeal' policy is a major roadblock to justice.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only