>>Because I want somebody to have the friggin cahones to come out and say what they are implying. He said he did not do anything to warrant a banning. Either dismiss the possibility that he did something to warrant a banning, call him a liar, or shut up.
>
>It has nothing to do with having or not cojones, I can not say he is lying because I do not know all the facts, but I can not dismiss the possibility either.

No facts are needed - Kevin said he did nothing wrong to get banned. Either you belive that statement or you don't.

>>I don't know if Michel is lying... did he ever say "Kevin did something that warranted banning"?
>
>Well, He banned Kevin, didn't He?

Justly? Who knows.