>>>>Because I want somebody to have the friggin cahones to come out and say what they are implying. He said he did not do anything to warrant a banning. Either dismiss the possibility that he did something to warrant a banning, call him a liar, or shut up.
>>>
>>>It has nothing to do with having or not cojones, I can not say he is lying because I do not know all the facts, but I can not dismiss the possibility either.
>>
>>No facts are needed - Kevin said he did nothing wrong to get banned. Either you belive that statement or you don't.
>>
>>>>I don't know if Michel is lying... did he ever say "Kevin did something that warranted banning"?
>>>
>>>Well, He banned Kevin, didn't He?
>>
>>Justly? Who knows.
>
>You either believe that Michel had enough justification or not, I do believe him.

Keep tapdancing.