>>>What is that alternative? I am trying to get somebody to say that he is lying instead of skirting around the issue, but nobody will do that.
>>
>>If you are talking about alternatives, you can not discard the ones that you do not like. And why do you want to get somebody to say that he is lying? On the other hand, do you think Michel Fournier is lying?
>
>Because I want somebody to have the friggin cahones to come out and say what they are implying. He said he did not do anything to warrant a banning. Either dismiss the possibility that he did something to warrant a banning, call him a liar, or shut up. I don't know if Michel is lying... did he ever say "Kevin did something that warranted banning"?

What I am hearing most people say is they don't know. Personally I neither know that Kevin was lying or what the reason was for his eviction.

It's cojones, BTW ;-)