>Well, to ID six people in a moving car from a traffic cam - I gotta say, I'd be impressed. John?

One of the checks it requested came up as follows:-

Driver POI - verify ID of 2 other occupants. && there were 3 in the car.

>
>
>>>>
>>>>I saw it tested a few years ago over here, they had to shut it down after a couple of minutes as it had identified a couple of hundred violations and there wasn't sufficient resources present to process the infringments.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Identified all six occupants in a moving vehicle. Wow. Amazing they could even see all six. Must have and incredible photometric database with some awesome processing power. I know some of the MI-5 folks who process CCTV feeds in London. They'd love to get their hands on something this good.
>>>
>>>But aren't you worried? I mean, that sounds a lot more intrusive than fingerprints. You must be terrified. I don't think I want to go to
>>>Australia and be subjected to that kind of Big Brother surveillance <s>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>> It is a basic concept that many people have difficulty addressing, but then again, we are all treated equally these days, equally guilty.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact is this, if I haven't done anything wrong I don't have to give the authorities anything, if you do something wrong you give up that right or is going to your country to visit a bad thing and warrants such action.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With present day technology, the passport can still do the job as it always has, and with current facial recognition systems that have been implemented they need no more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Current facial recognition systems are as reliable as hiring a medium to get clues from the afterlife.
>>>>>
>>>>>DNA is accurate.