>That's certainly different from the understanding I got from your previous message. I understood from that message that because this occurred at the same time Kevin was pushing for JVP to have access, you assumed it was related and it was Kevin giving him access. I honestly understood that from your previous message.
>

Sorry for the misunderstanding. At the time it happened, I considered that one of the possibilities, but I did not say anything to Michel about it.

Tamar


>>>>That is -- IF anyone reported anything.
>>>
>>>Tamar already said she did.
>>>
>>
>>Let's be clear. I said I reported to Michel that someone who was banned had some source of access to the messages here. At the time, Michel was being asked to reinstate that person, and I considered the possibility that said person had a pseudonymous account relevant to his decision.
>>
>>I did not accuse anyone here of providing that access, just reported the fact of it.
>>
>>Tamar