>>On a more serious note, I think Michel is flat out wrong for not disclosing this information.
>>
>>First let me say that I also don't agree with Kevin's banishment.
>>
>>Now consider this. If you were a regular at a restaurant for many rears, and one day they said, "We don't want
>>you in here ever again!", you would absolutly no options whatsoever. It's a private business and the owner can
>>decide who he/she wants in there. Period.
>>
>>How is this different that then Kevin's access to the UT?
>
>If I hung out at a restaurant with a friend for many years and the owner told him he wasn't welcome, I would want to know the justification to determine if I should hang out at the restaurant and possibly do more business, or leave with my friend.


But the owner would not have to give you one. Just like here at the UT, the owner does not owe anyone an
explanation.