>On a more serious note, I think Michel is flat out wrong for not disclosing this information.
>
>First let me say that I also don't agree with Kevin's banishment.
>
>Now consider this. If you were a regular at a restaurant for many rears, and one day they said, "We don't want
>you in here ever again!", you would absolutly no options whatsoever. It's a private business and the owner can
>decide who he/she wants in there. Period.
>
>How is this different that then Kevin's access to the UT?

How cute. You believe that I wouldn't feel and react exactly the same way about the restaurant owner. As far as I'm concerned, you just bolstered my point.