>>>On a more serious note, I think Michel is flat out wrong for not disclosing this information.
>>>
>>>First let me say that I also don't agree with Kevin's banishment.
>>>
>>>Now consider this. If you were a regular at a restaurant for many rears, and one day they said, "We don't want
>>>you in here ever again!", you would absolutly no options whatsoever. It's a private business and the owner can
>>>decide who he/she wants in there. Period.
>>>
>>>How is this different that then Kevin's access to the UT?
>>
>>If I hung out at a restaurant with a friend for many years and the owner told him he wasn't welcome, I would want to know the justification to determine if I should hang out at the restaurant and possibly do more business, or leave with my friend.
>
>
>But the owner would not have to give you one. Just like here at the UT, the owner does not owe anyone an
>explanation.

Technically? Maybe not, but on a human level, which I rarely see in MF actually, it would be decidedly expected.