>>>The other problem is that most of us seem to acknowledge that we've seen >nothing here from Kevin that would (in our opinions) justify banning. What >that means is that we have no way of deciding if and when we might find >doing whatever he did and being banned for that same unknown reason. That >kind of uncertainty does nobody any good.
>>
>>I do not agree with you. Besides the database threads with Walter lately, Kevin has been exclusively throwing mud at us idiots that stick with vfp, for many many monthes. When told to leave us alone in here, he would come back yet again and again, many messages daily. What do you think those messages did to the newcomers trying to get into vfp and/or this forum?
>>If using the restaurant metaphor, imagine we are a restaurant specializing in american food, with a new section specializing in fusion cuisine. Now we have this customer that keeps screaming that the american food s*cks, and how great the fusion cuisine is, but he will keep coming to the american food section and screaming at our american food day and night. Does the owner of the restaurant owe an explanation in that case? Not in my book...
>>
>>Jaime
>
>I repeat, show me a post.

I don't think anyone would dispute that Kevin had been pretty obnoxious lately, about VFP as well as other topics. That's not taking sides, just an observation. In fact I have already expressed, along with many others, my mystification about what Kevin did to get banned. Michel seems adamant about not shedding any light so I don't know if we will ever know.