>
>Did you see Jim Booth's response? If you have code on the Visible_assign, it can check the object's .Tag property and set it accordingly. You may even use a non .t./.f. value that's passed to indicate you want to use the .Tag property, and the _assign code could deal with it. That would allow you to still set the property to its natural .t./.f. if needed.

I saw Hugo's response first (using tag_assign) and responded. When I saw Jim's response it just didn't click. Many thanks for amplifying on it and bringing it to forefront. Worked like a charm.