>>Yes, this was headline news for almost a year here. You can read about the athlete here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erling_Havn%C3%A5
>>
>>>So, the athlete, and everyone else, knew exactly what he was being accused of?
>
>My point was that both the accused (the athlete), his friends and family, and the general public knew exactly what the charges were against him, as well as the evidence.
>
>In this case, we know none of those things. We don't know why Kevin was banned, it appears (although we don't know for certain) that Kevin does not know why he was banned. I agree with you that there are at least 3 sides to every story, but in this case, we know none of them.

Kevin told me he had no clue why he was banned.