Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
XML To Dataset
Message
 
To
19/03/2008 10:51:10
Mike Cole
Yellow Lab Technologies
Stanley, Iowa, United States
General information
Forum:
ASP.NET
Category:
Coding, syntax and commands
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01303148
Message ID:
01303369
Views:
22
>>>>>>>>>>I'm doing an app which is initially a C# WinForms app where the users will connect via VPN.
>>>>>>>>>>At some point in the future it will be converted to a web app, so I want to use a WS up front.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I'm fairly new at this, and I've seen some examples, as well as prior postings with you and Bonnie
>>>>>>>>>>that got me going this way.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I didn't think you could pass a dataset through a WS into the back end.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>.NET to .NET you can pass pretty much anything. As long as the client understands the type it can be completely transparent.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>But, as I said to Mike, if you anticipate that non-NET clients will be using your WS then passing back a DataSet as XML is not particularly consumer friendly.
>>>>>>>>>OTOH (and I don't know if it's just me but) I find I'm dealing with a lot of web services that do just that. Great if you're a .NET consumer; pain if you're not......
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Not sure I understand. You're saying that XML is not consumer friendly?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>.NET DataSet created XML isn't - it's kind of a mess.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But wouldn't it be easier to pass around than a data set, as it's a string?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, to me it would be easier to pass around. I think what we are trying to say is DataSet.WriteXML creates "Microsoftized" XML, the same way Frontpage creates "Microsoftized" HTML. I have tried to pass .NET created XML to VFP and VFP created XML to .NET with little success. If you want to create a web service that returns a truly generic XML string, you are probably better off manually constructing the string.
>>>>
>>>>Ok, I see. Leave to MS to change the XML.
>>>
>>>They didn't really "change" it, they just made it more complicated that they probably needed to. I live by the KISS (keep it simple, stupid) methodology and MS doesn't.
>>
>>Does the XML follow standards? You mentioned not being able to work with it in VFP, so I'm wondering if it's safe
>>to use.
>
>Sure, it follows standards. I just had problems using the built in methods in both languages to produce XML that was compatible with each other. Granted, I am not an XML expert.

Ok, well my aim is to allow access to the data via XML so that any XML compliant client can call it. I also like
Michel's suggestion of creating .Net specific methods that return datasets. I'll probably build those in when I'm
done.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind
public class SystemCrasher :ICrashable
In addition, an integer field is not for irrational people
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform