>I don't know what politics are like in Canada, but your answers seem to be close to what I would expect from a U.S. politician in a scandal:
>
>- We can't reveal the reasons.
>- It depends.
>- Parameters?
>- Assume that we made the right decision.
>
>Perhaps it is a problem with language, but I'm no clearer on the answers than when they were asked.

I am not sure exactly what is the question, but all those issues are usually related to exageration, assumptions and things like that and that the source of the problem usually relates that some members came in here assuming that the rules were not applying to them. Like I said, if members respect the rules of the site, those situations would never happen.

I already received comments in the past that some members said that they were above the rules and/or that they were more important than other members. With that kind of attitude, it came as no surprise to me that for those having said that that they were also related to the source of several problems.

Now, as to know about the perception that some individuals may have based on what is being said from this side, they are entitled to their own opinions.