>>I am not sure exactly what is the question, but all those issues are usually related to exageration, assumptions and things like that and that the source of the problem usually relates that some members came in here assuming that the rules were not applying to them. Like I said, if members respect the rules of the site, those situations would never happen.
>>
>>I already received comments in the past that some members said that they were above the rules and/or that they were more important than other members. With that kind of attitude, it came as no surprise to me that for those having said that that they were also related to the source of several problems.
>>
>>Now, as to know about the perception that some individuals may have based on what is being said from this side, they are entitled to their own opinions.
>
>The question has been clear for some time now:
>
>Why was Kevin banned?
>
>I don't think it can be asked any plainer than that.
>
>Your answers, and the answers of others, have left me just as confused as before the question was asked. The answers have reminded me of answers a politician gives when they are in a scandal. They are vague, come with insinuations, changing explanations, and what I believe to be obfuscation.

I think a better question is why wasn't Kevin notified of the reason? It would then be up to Kevin to reveal this to the general public.