>I would just make an assumption by reading this thread (I was not around when actual thing happened). As I can deduce, it is something about fake identities and multiple accounts, i.e. something that can be proven technically much easier than legally. If it is the case than saying it openly could put legal burden of proof on UT management, and it might cause certain inconveniences.

In my opinion, that just makes this situation worse. Now we have the insinuation (I am not accusing you of making that insinuation, as I think it is reasonable to see that in Michael's post) that Kevin created a fake identity on the UT. By being so vague, and including insinuations in hist, Michael is leaving open to interpretation that Kevin has done that.