I was only responding to the part of your post about chatter threads "cluttering up" the forum and outnumbering threads with technical content. It's a chatter forum. Anyone who wants just, or primarily, technical content should visit the VFP, .NET, etc. forums.


>It's the negative chatter and constant bringing up of the same question... which has been answered. It is not the answer some wanted, but it is all that's going to be given. It is the amount of time spent beating the dead horse. It's unproductive. I replied to someone else, imagine a person coming here for the first time and finding that the amount of negative chatter far out weighs technical content. My guess is the majority would not stay. Some have said that banning Kevin will hurt the UT. I propose that continuing to beat this dead horse and continue with the negative talk will hurt the UT.
>
>>Craig, have you not noticed this is a chatter forum? Why would anyone be surprised to find lots of chatter here?
>>
>>
>>>1. I don't read most of the posts in those threads. But, they are there, cluttering up what could be a fantastic forum. Think of the person coming here for the first time and they see far more of those types of threads than technical content.
>>>
>>>2. Michel and Kevin may indeed resolve whatever issue exists between them, but that still won't change Michel's stand that he won't give out any specifics on bannings and may or may not result in Kevin's return.
>>>
>>>
>>>>I really found nothing constructive in your comments about people posting more in the Chatter section and going to a social networking site.
>>>>
>>>>I do have some things to add that I think are constructive:
>>>>
>>>>1. If you don't like what someone posts, don't read their posts. I generally feel the same way about things on TV. If you find someone (or a channel) to be objectionable, don't read their posts (watch that channel).
>>>>
>>>>2. I would like to see Michael and Kevin resolve this.