It doesn't appear to me that bush asks another country for anything. More like demands or forces. I saw a link today for a new book by a Chilean politician over what he witnessed in his country's dealing with ours.

McCain obviously has the most experience when it comes to military affairs. But I think some of his comments are similar to those of people like Henry Kissinger. And point to an almost chip on their shoulder still left from the Vietnam era.

To me this comment from Bill Maher really hits the nail on the head:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/index.php?s=bill+maher

New Rule: Old soldiers never die, they get young soldiers killed....Some people look at McCain and see a tough guy who is going to protect us from the “Islamofascists.” I look at him and see a walking Tom Clancy action figure who is going to get us all killed.

>I watched her interview on BBC America. It was very interesting. I haven't been able to locate a video clip or written transcript of it yet. She was asked of the three candidates, whose Iraq plan had the greatest possiblity of success. She pointed out the merits and faults of each. In the end, she stated that it really determines how we measure success. If it is for the longterm stability and democracy in Iraq, then Obama's plan would have the most success because his goal of a drawdown of troops and replacing those troops with UN soldiers would benefit Iraq the most. Granted, Bush has asked for the same thing from other countries, but the same request coming from a new cabinet would allow other countries to participate and save face in doing so. They can provide the support without an agreement with the current cabinet's policies being attached to it.
>
>I watched an interview with students of the Baghad university today. It was very interesting. The students were as divided as our country as to which candidate would be best for Iraq. I heard one push for McCain, one for Clinton (an Arab man which was interesting), and one for Obama. The last girl who spoke seemed to echo her fellow students' view on the situation in general (aside from which candidate she would like to see win) -- she stated that it doesn't matter how successful the surge is or how secure Iraq is, what will change her country and what is needed most is unity in her government and her people. The discussion should not be about security but unity. Until they can unite, they will fail. They think the sectarian violence comes from outside Iraq (she said that none of the students or her family or friends discussed any type of separatism or racism - it was only on the news and in the bombings) and is the fault of a country whose goal is instability in Iraq - she did
>not say which country and the journalist did not ask (interesting). Also, she stated that there is so much corruption in the government, the police, and the Iraqi security forces that no one has faith in anyone.
>
>It makes me wonder how success can ever be achieved there and at what point do we step aside? When the government asks us to? When the people of Iraq ask us to? When our own citizens of this country ask us to? Will the government and the people of Iraq ever be ready to govern themselves in a democracy?
>
>>No I haven't but it looks very worthwhile. I'll make sure to watch them this week.
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>>Thanks for the heads up Perry. Have you by any chance seen any of the videos or papers by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace?
>>>
>>>http://www.carnegieendowment.org/events/index.cfm?fa=eventDetail&id=1107&&prog=zgp&proj=zme,zusr
>>>
>>>>This should be excellent. Presented in 2 parts over tonite and tomorrow nite:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/