>>>I don't think even a tiny percent of people in this forum, who know about what Andy did, would agree with you. Isn't this why he never showed up here since he committed the evil deed?
>>
>>Please don't speak for all of us on the UT. Many of us disagree with your statement 100%. The problem I have is when you said "people in this forum who know about what Andy did". The full facts of the situation you refer to have never been publically revealed, therefore, the majority of the people on the UT do NOT know what happened. If the full facts were revealed, it would certainly shed a different light on the situation. I'm not at liberty to reveal the facts, and I'm not about to get sucked into further discussions on it so don't bother asking more questions. But I feel strongly enough to publically state my support of Andy and to state he is an extremely ethical person who has been wrongly villianized on this forum.
>
>I would like to know how a person who writes to some one's employer with the purpose of having this person fired and losing means to support a family can be considered an ethical person. I believe majority of people on this forum would agree that he committed a despicable act.

You certainly have the right to maintain your opinion of Andy. And you certain have the right to maintain the belief that you have all the facts and have based your judgment of Andy accordingly. That is your right.

I, however, am aware of additional facts in the situation and have based my opinion of Andy accordingly. I stand by my statement.